![]() ![]() We're in an enterprise though, so Windows Integrated Authentication is available to Apps and Services: I even wrote a library some number of years ago in prep of today's project. We don't have Windows Integrated Authentication at the database, so the apps log into the database with a separate username/password. So our focus isn't on scalable performance, but a software and system architecture that leaves us free to add features easily.Įvery app has to have a database communication layer in it, which makes maintenance on the software and the database very difficult.Īdding features means releasing new desktop apps and waiting for users to update installs. ![]() But we don't have a huge amount of computational load - realistically I'm only looking at query rates of a few hundred queries a minute at the worst. We have a lot of complexity - lots of functions, queries, reports - lots of data, etc. I own everything - the client apps, the databases, and should I ask for it, a small server environment to run services. Databases are used for storing and fetching engineering data, test results, etc. We have a lot of winforms/wpf/console apps that run on end-user machines and directly connect to our databases to get work done. I work for a hardware+software engineering enterprise with a lot of in-house apps and tech. I've been pulling my hair out over this for months, and I really just need to talk to someone that understands application service infrastructure. ![]() I'm just trying to make my software at work better for my dev team and my users, so apologies upfront if I seem to have weird ideas. I've worked on large software libraries for almost 20 years now, but I've never worked with building a Service Bus like this, but I have spent several months doing some research. I should note first, I'm out of my element here. I'm working on building a services infrastructure to rework a lot of in-house apps at my work, and I need some help. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |